The end of the tax year 2000/01 sees the abolition of some important benefits. Changes to life cover and waiver of contribution will also occur at the end of this tax year:
- in future, the cost of life cover cannot be more than 10% of the contribution, rather than 5% of net relevant earnings as at present. This will really limit the life cover that can be obtained by individuals paying low contributions and cause problems for anyone wishing or needing to reduce future contributions
- from 6 April 2001, an individual will no longer be allowed to use part of the pension contributions to fund for a waiver benefit. Contracts in place before then can continue on the current basis provided the plan included a waiver option "even where that option has not been exercised at that date"
- anyone wishing to insure against not being able to afford a contribution due to illness or accident (or unemployment) will have to take out an unconnected plan which will not obtain tax relief on the contributions
- if the individual uses the benefits from a waiver plan to fund a personal pension they will be able to pay net of basic rate tax
These changes mean that higher rate taxpayers whose earnings cease in the future will lose out on tax relief on the contributions. Also, anyone paying contributions over £3,600 who suffers a long term illness - and likely to have no net
relevant earnings - will eventually be limited to only being able to pay £3,600 into their personal pension plan.
Consider someone paying say, £10,000 pa and making a claim under existing or new waiver. The existing waiver would credit the plan with £10,000 pa potentially through to retirement, whereas under new waiver the maximum contribution to the plan may be limited to £3,600 pa in five years time.
The new dilemma
The year-end choices may be difficult. Will the current rules for life cover be more beneficial for an individual than the rules after 5 April? Should contributions be paid before the year-end to obtain the current waiver rules or will waiting until after the year-end (and carrying back) be more beneficial with better cash flow?
An Independent Financial Adviser can help with these decisions, and offer guidance through this maze of 'simplification'.